![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() contribute?
Do you want to contribute anything to this site? This can range from linking it and spreading the word to writing an entry yourself! If you would like to write an entry, comment on a blog entry and I'll get back to you.
sub-sites
I have two image blogs that are spin-offs of this blog. One is dedicated to intertitles and another is dedicated to close-ups.
sub-site directory
The Soul of Cinema links in
To link this site, you can use a text link or the button below. If you use the button, do not direct link.![]() links out
Please check out the following sites; they are all worth a visit. If you own a website related to movies and would like to exchange links, comment on an entry stating so and I'd be more than happy to link you here.Thomas More's Movie Room Silents, Please! The Large Association of Movie Blogs search
You can look up directors, actors, titles, countries, and years through the search box or click the category you want to look under.
archives
|
![]() |
Love And Savagery ; 2009 · Posted by Tallulah
Posted by Maddy Director: John N. Smith A Newfie rock enthusiast walks into a bar in Ireland in 1969. He falls in love with the local waitress who unfortunately is destined to be a nun. Their relationship shakes up the sediment that the town is resting on. Ba domp domp. All joking aside the new film Love and Savagery, an Irish/Canadian collaboration is nothing more than a series of clichés and tropes making the film void of any sort of punch as my punchline. ![]() It is astounding how formulaic this film is. Michael’s best friend shows up at some point, who is as jolly, bearded and rotund as they come. Cathleen’s stern uncle glowers at her for her decisions not understand what she is feeling. The wise Mother Superior watches sagely the doomed romance in front of her, advising when she can. The pressures of religion and society versus that of true love are what keep these two kids and the film going. Cathleen cannot be with him due to a promise she made to her dying mother and Michael gives her very little credit for her religious choices, constantly coming when he’s not supposed to. It is difficult to vouch for their sincerity, but that might be the immediate connection they have and the series of clichés they use to describe their feelings for one another – at one instance Cathleen describes him as someone she has felt that “she has known for a very long time.” John N. Smith certainly has an eye for scenery as his camera pans across the vast Irish landscape, which is later mirrored in the shores of Newfoundland. Outside of that the film is generic and often forced, though that might be due to what little interesting material they all had to work with. The film flirts with elements that could cause some interest – the relationships of Newfoundlanders and the Irish in contrast to Canada and England, tensions between desire and faith, any ancient Celtic tradition involving rocks all of which are skirted for the oldest love story and certainly the most over done. The film is certainly competent and is far from any sort of cinematic disaster, but is so dull and trite that one wonders what the point of it all was. The poet interacts with a creature that can never be his and ends up becoming inspired, only to remain in sadness by the end. One can only wish that the film had its own unrequited love in order to have inspired it to be marginally interesting. This film is as dull as the rocks the characters walk on and features a love story treaded on by too many leaving the surface smooth and thoroughly dull. Leave a Reply |